Analyzing Docker Container Forensics

When to Use

• When investigating a compromised Docker container or container host
• For analyzing malicious Docker images pulled from registries
• During incident response involving containerized application breaches
• When examining container escape attempts or privilege escalation
• For auditing container configurations and identifying misconfigurations

Prerequisites

• Docker CLI access on the forensic workstation
• Access to the Docker host file system (forensic image or live)
• Understanding of Docker layered file system (overlay2, aufs)
• dive, docker-explorer, or container-diff for image analysis
• Knowledge of Docker daemon configuration and socket security
• Trivy or Grype for vulnerability scanning of container images

Workflow

Step 1: Preserve Container State and Evidence

# List all containers (including stopped)
docker ps -a --no-trunc > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_list.txt

# Inspect the compromised container
CONTAINER_ID="abc123def456"
docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json

# Export container filesystem as tarball (preserves current state)
docker export $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar

# Create an image from the container's current state
docker commit $CONTAINER_ID forensic-evidence:case-2024-001
docker save forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar

# Capture container logs
docker logs $CONTAINER_ID --timestamps > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_logs.txt 2>&1

# Capture running processes (if container is still running)
docker top $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_processes.txt

# Capture network connections
docker exec $CONTAINER_ID netstat -tlnp 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_network.txt

# Copy specific files from the container
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/var/log/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_var_log/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/tmp/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_tmp/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/etc/passwd /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_passwd

# Hash all exported evidence
sha256sum /cases/case-2024-001/docker/*.tar > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/evidence_hashes.txt

Step 2: Analyze Container Image Layers

# Install dive for image layer analysis
wget https://github.com/wagoodman/dive/releases/latest/download/dive_linux_amd64.deb
sudo dpkg -i dive_linux_amd64.deb

# Analyze image layers interactively
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001

# Non-interactive layer analysis
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 --ci --json /cases/case-2024-001/docker/dive_analysis.json

# Extract and examine individual layers
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/

# List the image manifest and layer order
cat /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/manifest.json | python3 -m json.tool

# Examine each layer for changes
for layer in /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/*/layer.tar; do
    echo "=== Layer: $(dirname $layer | xargs basename) ==="
    tar -tf "$layer" | head -20
    echo "..."
done

# Use container-diff to compare with original base image
# Install container-diff
curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/container-diff/latest/container-diff-linux-amd64
chmod +x container-diff-linux-amd64

# Compare committed image with original
./container-diff-linux-amd64 diff daemon://nginx:latest daemon://forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --type=file --type=apt --type=history --json \
   > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_diff.json

Step 3: Examine Docker Host Artifacts

# Docker data directory (default: /var/lib/docker/)
DOCKER_ROOT="/mnt/evidence/var/lib/docker"

# Examine overlay2 filesystem layers
ls -la $DOCKER_ROOT/overlay2/

# Find the container's merged filesystem
CONTAINER_HASH=$(docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID --format '{{.GraphDriver.Data.MergedDir}}' 2>/dev/null)
# Or manually from forensic image:
# Look in /var/lib/docker/containers/<container_id>/config.v2.json

# Analyze container configuration files
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/config.v2.json | python3 -m json.tool \
   > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_config.json

# Check Docker daemon configuration
cat /mnt/evidence/etc/docker/daemon.json 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/daemon_config.json

# Examine Docker events log
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/*.log > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_json_logs.txt

# Check for volume mounts (potential host filesystem access)
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json

with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)

inspect = data[0] if isinstance(data, list) else data

print("=== CONTAINER SECURITY ANALYSIS ===\n")

# Check mounts
print("Volume Mounts:")
for mount in inspect.get('Mounts', []):
    rw = "READ-WRITE" if mount.get('RW') else "READ-ONLY"
    print(f"  {mount.get('Source', 'N/A')} -> {mount.get('Destination', 'N/A')} ({rw})")
    if mount.get('Source') in ('/', '/etc', '/var', '/root') and mount.get('RW'):
        print(f"    WARNING: Sensitive host path mounted read-write!")

# Check privileged mode
host_config = inspect.get('HostConfig', {})
if host_config.get('Privileged'):
    print("\nWARNING: Container was running in PRIVILEGED mode!")

# Check capabilities
cap_add = host_config.get('CapAdd', [])
if cap_add:
    print(f"\nAdded Capabilities: {cap_add}")
    dangerous_caps = ['SYS_ADMIN', 'SYS_PTRACE', 'NET_ADMIN', 'SYS_MODULE']
    for cap in cap_add:
        if cap in dangerous_caps:
            print(f"  WARNING: Dangerous capability: {cap}")

# Check PID namespace
if host_config.get('PidMode') == 'host':
    print("\nWARNING: Container shares host PID namespace!")

# Check network mode
if host_config.get('NetworkMode') == 'host':
    print("\nWARNING: Container shares host network namespace!")

# Check user
user = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('User', 'root (default)')
print(f"\nRunning as user: {user}")

# Check environment variables for secrets
env_vars = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('Env', [])
print(f"\nEnvironment Variables: {len(env_vars)}")
for env in env_vars:
    key = env.split('=')[0]
    if any(s in key.upper() for s in ['PASSWORD', 'SECRET', 'KEY', 'TOKEN', 'CREDENTIAL']):
        print(f"  SENSITIVE: {key}=***REDACTED***")
PYEOF

Step 4: Analyze Container File System Changes

# Compare container filesystem to original image
docker diff $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt

# A = Added, C = Changed, D = Deleted
# Analyze changes
python3 << 'PYEOF'
added = []
changed = []
deleted = []

with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt') as f:
    for line in f:
        line = line.strip()
        if line.startswith('A '):
            added.append(line[2:])
        elif line.startswith('C '):
            changed.append(line[2:])
        elif line.startswith('D '):
            deleted.append(line[2:])

print(f"Files Added: {len(added)}")
print(f"Files Changed: {len(changed)}")
print(f"Files Deleted: {len(deleted)}")

# Flag suspicious additions
suspicious = [f for f in added if any(s in f for s in
    ['/tmp/', '/dev/shm/', '/root/', '.sh', '.py', '.elf', 'reverse', 'shell', 'backdoor'])]
if suspicious:
    print(f"\nSuspicious Added Files:")
    for f in suspicious:
        print(f"  {f}")

# Flag suspicious changes
sus_changed = [f for f in changed if any(s in f for s in
    ['/etc/passwd', '/etc/shadow', '/etc/crontab', '/etc/ssh', '.bashrc'])]
if sus_changed:
    print(f"\nSuspicious Changed Files:")
    for f in sus_changed:
        print(f"  {f}")
PYEOF

# Extract and examine the container export
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/

# Scan for webshells and malicious files
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/tmp/ -type f -exec file {} \;
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ -name "*.php" -newer /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/etc/hostname

Step 5: Scan for Vulnerabilities and Generate Report

# Scan the image for known vulnerabilities
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --format json \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/vulnerability_scan.json

# Scan the exported filesystem
trivy fs /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ \
   --format table \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/fs_vulnerabilities.txt

# Check for secrets in the image
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --scanners secret \
   --format json \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/secrets_scan.json

Key Concepts

Concept	Description
Image layers	Read-only filesystem layers stacked to form the container image
overlay2	Default Docker storage driver using union filesystem for layers
Container diff	Comparison of runtime filesystem changes against the original image
Privileged mode	Container with full host capabilities (bypasses most isolation)
Docker socket	Unix socket (/var/run/docker.sock) controlling the Docker daemon
Container escape	Technique for breaking out of container isolation to the host
Volume mounts	Host filesystem paths made accessible inside the container
Image history	Record of Dockerfile instructions used to build each layer

Tools & Systems

Tool	Purpose
docker inspect	Detailed container configuration and state information
docker diff	Show filesystem changes made in a running/stopped container
dive	Interactive Docker image layer analysis tool
container-diff	Google tool for comparing container image contents
Trivy	Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
docker-explorer	Forensic tool for offline Docker artifact analysis
Sysdig	Container runtime security monitoring and forensics
Falco	Runtime threat detection for containers and Kubernetes

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Web Application Container Compromise

Export the container filesystem, identify webshells in web root, analyze access logs for exploitation attempts, check for added files and modified configurations, examine network connections for C2 communication, review container capabilities for escalation paths.

Scenario 2: Supply Chain Attack via Malicious Image

Analyze image layers with dive to identify which layer added malicious content, compare with the official base image using container-diff, check image history for suspicious RUN commands, scan for embedded backdoors and cryptocurrency miners, trace the image pull from registry logs.

Scenario 3: Container Escape Investigation

Check if container ran privileged or with dangerous capabilities, examine host filesystem mount points for unauthorized access, review Docker socket mount enabling Docker-in-Docker abuse, analyze host system logs for container escape indicators, check for kernel exploit artifacts.

Scenario 4: Cryptojacking in Container Environment

Identify high-CPU containers, export and analyze the container image for mining binaries, check for unauthorized images in the registry, review container creation events for rogue deployments, examine network connections for mining pool communications.

Output Format

Docker Container Forensics Summary:
  Container: abc123def456 (nginx-app)
  Image: company/web-app:v2.1
  Status: Running (started 2024-01-10 09:00 UTC)
  Host: docker-host-01.corp.local

  Security Configuration:
    Privileged: No
    Capabilities Added: NET_ADMIN (WARNING)
    Volume Mounts: /var/log -> /host-logs (RW)
    Network Mode: bridge
    User: root (WARNING)

  Filesystem Changes:
    Added: 23 files (5 suspicious)
    Changed: 12 files (2 suspicious)
    Deleted: 0 files

  Suspicious Findings:
    /tmp/reverse.sh - Reverse shell script (Added)
    /var/www/html/.hidden/shell.php - PHP webshell (Added)
    /etc/crontab - Modified (persistence cron entry added)
    /root/.ssh/authorized_keys - Modified (unauthorized key added)

  Vulnerability Scan:
    Critical: 3 (CVE-2024-xxxx in base image)
    High: 12
    Medium: 34

  Evidence: /cases/case-2024-001/docker/

Verification Criteria

Confirm successful execution by validating:

• [ ] All prerequisite tools and access requirements are satisfied
• [ ] Each workflow step completed without errors
• [ ] Output matches expected format and contains expected data
• [ ] No security warnings or misconfigurations detected
• [ ] Results are documented and evidence is preserved for audit

Compliance Framework Mapping

This skill supports compliance evidence collection across multiple frameworks:

• SOC 2: CC7.3 (Incident Identification), CC7.4 (Incident Response)
• ISO 27001: A.16.1 (Security Incident Management), A.12.4 (Logging)
• NIST 800-53: AU-6 (Audit Review), IR-4 (Incident Handling), AU-9 (Audit Protection)
• NIST CSF: RS.AN (Analysis), RS.RP (Response Planning)

Claw GRC Tip: When this skill is executed by a registered agent, compliance evidence is automatically captured and mapped to the relevant controls in your active frameworks.

Deploying This Skill with Claw GRC

Agent Execution

Register this skill with your Claw GRC agent for automated execution:

# Install via CLI
npx claw-grc skills add analyzing-docker-container-forensics

# Or load dynamically via MCP
grc.load_skill("analyzing-docker-container-forensics")

Audit Trail Integration

When executed through Claw GRC, every step of this skill generates tamper-evident audit records:

• SHA-256 chain hashing ensures no step can be modified after execution
• Evidence artifacts (configs, scan results, logs) are automatically attached to relevant controls
• Trust score impact — successful execution increases your agent's trust score

Continuous Compliance

Schedule this skill for recurring execution to maintain continuous compliance posture. Claw GRC monitors for drift and alerts when re-execution is needed.